0.76.
No.
Hongkong.
C.O.
13012
Prd 20 APR 05!
Government House,
Hongkong, 17th. March, 1905.
236
sir.
70
1104
I have the honour to acknowledge the re-
ceipt of your Despatch No. 10 dated the 17th. January, 1905,
in the 3rd. paragraph of which you call for my views as to
the desirability of introducing in Hongkong legislation to
enable some tax to be levied on property held by trusts and
institutions to compensate the Government for the fact that
succession duty cannot be levied on such property.
2.
I assume that the scope of such legisla-
tion if enacted should exclude trading corporations where
capital stock is so divided and held as to be liable to pro-
bate duty. The fairness of this exclusion was set forth in the
minute of the Acting Attorney-General of the Straits Settle-
ments which was transmitted in Sir John Swettenham's Despatch
You
19348
•No.
206 dated the 9th. May, 1901.
3.
Immovable property which is the site of
or is occupied in connection with a place of worship, school
or other building appropriated to Ecclesiastical or Charitable
purposes would also be exempted.
4.
With these exemptions there would practic-
- aliy
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
&C..
ALFRED LYTTELTON, K.C., M.P.,
80 ..
8cc...
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.